Search
You can find the results of your search below.
Matching pagenames:
Fulltext results:
- Kuva 86: Tukholma @fi:valokuvaus:valokuvat:200504_helsinki_stockholm_helsinki
- metatags>metatag-robots=(noindex,nofollow)}} The contrast of Stockholm:"a classical building on the front a
- Photo 86: Stockholm @en:photography:photos:200504_helsinki_stockholm_helsinki
- ====== Photo 86: Stockholm ====== The contrast of Stockholm:"a classical building on the front and modern
- Photo 65: Contrast @en:photography:photos:2004_2009_misc_and_art
- ====== Photo 65: Contrast ====== Testing the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 [[{}.:64|<<<<<< Previous]] [[{}.:6... 09_misc_and_art/img_5003-700.jpg?nocache&.700x911|Contrast}}]] [[{}.:64|<<<<<< Previous]] [[{}.:66|Next >>
- Page 3 @en:photography:photos:2004_2009_misc_and_art
- 009_misc_and_art/img_5003-200.jpg?nocache&153x200|Contrast · A selection of artistic photos · photo 65}}]] [
- Ricoh GR @en:photography:compact_cameras
- ed 28 mm equiv. focal length is limiting. * The contrast-based focusing has troubles to focus in low light
- Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 @en:photography:compact_cameras
- ilm_x_s1|Fujifilm X-S1]]. * FZ1000 has the best contrast-based autofocus that I've seen in any camera. It ... ce! Even at 400 mm it appears to have details and contrast. Compared to this [fujifilm_x_s1|Fujifilm X-S1]]
- Nytech ND-4020 @en:photography:compact_cameras
- seems to happen easiest when the object has a low contrast. I assume that the autofocus problem is a firmwar
- Fujifilm X-S1 @en:photography:compact_cameras
- onic viewfinder (EVF). ===== Cons ===== * The contrast-based auto focus randomly fails to achieve focus ... t: it is not the sharpest one, the resolution and contrast suffer at tele end and there is a noticeable blur... ds the tele end the lens loses some sharpness and contrast. The important thing to remember is that the len... ode or setting changes. The focusing is based on contrast detection and so it is clearly inferior compared
- Sigma 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 APO Macro Super II @en:photography:camera_lenses
- down ===== Pros ===== * reasonably sharp, good contrast and nice colors at the wide end (approx. 70 - 120... and f/11) especially at tele end * at tele end contrast weakens, colors turn to gray and sharpness suffer
- Sigma 10mm f/2.8 EX DC HSM Fisheye @en:photography:camera_lenses
- * shows some chromatic aberration around strong contrast edges (but show me a fisheye lens that doesn't)
- Samyang 8mm f/3.5 Aspherical IF MC Fisheye @en:photography:camera_lenses
- * images shot full open lack some sharpness and contrast, so best to use it starting from f/5.6 * targe
- MC Rubinar 500mm f/8 Reflex @en:photography:camera_lenses
- try a mirror lens once ===== Cons ===== * weak contrast * not very sharp * requires plenty of light t
- Lensbaby Composer @en:photography:camera_lenses
- a toy * rather nice images in terms of colors, contrast and sharpness compared to the toyish appearance o
- Jupiter-37AM 135mm f/3.5 @en:photography:camera_lenses
- = * nice natural colors * usable shapness and contrast even wide open * metal and glass only, no plast
- Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 @en:photography:camera_lenses
- s with it ===== Cons ===== * images lack color, contrast and definition (the difference in these areas is