Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

en:information_technology:server_benchmarks:hetzner_vq_19_vps [2017-10-19 03:59]
en:information_technology:server_benchmarks:hetzner_vq_19_vps [2019-10-24 22:39] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Server benchmark: Hetzner VQ 19 VPS ======
 +
 +  * 2011
 +  * Hetzner VQ 19 VPS
 +  * Single Core
 +  * 2 GB RAM
 +  * 80 GB HD on some sort of RAID
 +  * no backup space
 +  * 4 TB traffic/mo
 +  * https://​www.hetzner.de/​
 +  * Debian 6.0 64 bit
 +  * Tests run 2011-07-26
 +
 +<​code>​
 +UnixBench 5.1.2
 +./Run dhry2reg whetstone-double syscall pipe context1 spawn execl shell1 shell8 shell16
 +
 +========================================================================
 +   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
 +
 +   ​System:​ Debian-60-squeeze-64-minimal:​ GNU/Linux
 +   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-amd64 -- #1 SMP Tue Jun 14 09:42:28 UTC 2011
 +   ​Machine:​ x86_64 (unknown)
 +   ​Language:​ en_US.utf8 (charmap="​UTF-8",​ collate="​UTF-8"​)
 +   CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.12.3 (5614.1 bogomips)
 +          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/​SYSEXIT,​ SYSCALL/​SYSRET
 +   ​21:​58:​33 up 1 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.37, 0.10, 0.03; runlevel 2
 +
 +------------------------------------------------------------------------
 +Benchmark Run: Tue Jul 26 2011 21:58:33 - 22:22:39
 +1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
 +
 +Dhrystone 2 using register variables ​      ​24231683.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
 +Double-Precision Whetstone ​                    ​3385.5 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
 +Execl Throughput ​                              ​4053.9 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
 +Pipe Throughput ​                            ​2070396.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
 +Pipe-based Context Switching ​                ​388304.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
 +Process Creation ​                             14303.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
 +Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) ​                  ​5484.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
 +Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) ​                  401.0 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
 +Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) ​                   848.0 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
 +System Call Overhead ​                       4054643.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
 +
 +System Benchmarks Partial Index              BASELINE ​      ​RESULT ​   INDEX
 +Dhrystone 2 using register variables ​        ​116700.0 ​  ​24231683.1 ​  ​2076.4
 +Double-Precision Whetstone ​                      ​55.0 ​      ​3385.5 ​   615.5
 +Execl Throughput ​                                ​43.0 ​      ​4053.9 ​   942.8
 +Pipe Throughput ​                              ​12440.0 ​   2070396.2 ​  ​1664.3
 +Pipe-based Context Switching ​                  ​4000.0 ​    ​388304.2 ​   970.8
 +Process Creation ​                               126.0      14303.5 ​  ​1135.2
 +Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) ​                    ​42.4 ​      ​5484.8 ​  ​1293.6
 +Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) ​                    ​--- ​       401.0      ---
 +Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) ​                     6.0        848.0   ​1413.4
 +System Call Overhead ​                         15000.0 ​   4054643.4 ​  ​2703.1
 +                                                                   ​========
 +System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)                         ​1304.3
 +</​code>​
 +
 +the best of three subsequent test runs of
 +
 +<​code>​
 +dd if=/​dev/​zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
 +</​code>​
 +
 +<​code>​
 +1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 30.9888 s, 34.6 MB/s
 +</​code>​
 +
 +the best of three subsequent test runs of
 +
 +<​code>​
 +hdparm -t dev
 +</​code>​
 +
 +<​code>​
 +Timing buffered disk reads: 606 MB in  3.01 seconds = 201.37 MB/sec
 +</​code>​
 +
 +Disclaimer: based on my experience disk performance testing with dd and hdparm are crude methods. The real-life disk load of a web service cannot be emulated with dd or hdparm.
 +
 +{{tag>​server_benchmark server benchmark Hetzner Debian linux IT 2011}}